The White Tiger (2021) - Aravind Adiga's mind-blowing, Man Booker Prize winning novel adapted into a film.
image credits: Netflix
The White Tiger is available to watch on NETFLIX
Direction & Screenplay: Ramin Bahrani
Starring: Adarsh Gourav, Rajkummar Rao, Priyanka Chopra
Cinematography: Paolo Carnera
(There is a special and personal note at the end of this review.)
The White Tiger makes you aware of the mental bondages that manifests into
physical traps. Through age we become so habitual of these traps that we
fail to realize, that we are ones who have birthed them. We see these traps,
label them as our fate, and continue with the labour of striving through them, meanwhile summing it all up near our deathbed as 'life'.
Story: The story
deals with the old archetype of class divide. The servant versus the master.
The oppressor versus the oppressed. The one weird, keen-eyed servant who finds
the teachings of the 'rich dad' in his wealthy oppressors and abandons the teachings of
the 'poor dad' from his past. The underdog outshining the millions stuck in the
rooster coop (the cage where chickens are kept in a butcher shop) of poverty.
The only catch is that there is a huge moral penalty he has to pay to access
that freedom.
"99.9% of us are caught in the rooster coop. The trustworthiness of
servants is so strong that you can put the key of emancipation in a man's hand
and he will throw it back at you with a curse." Balram's dialogue states.
The prime character of the film – the underdog – is Balram. His fear and adaptability
is driven with a natural element when it comes to the aspirations to please the
ultra riches and ultimately become one; and also towards his blood/wealth
sucking grandmother.
Throughout the film, the viewer not only experiences Balram's state of mind and
events, but simultaneously wonders about the chains of his/her own mind.
Acting: Balram isn't a meak person.
He is cunning, and most importantly, adaptable. After all, this world is but
the survival of the most adaptable. Adarsh
Gourav (who plays Balram) puts on a fake smile or a demeanour of a concerned
servant, just when the situation demands of him. Balram is aware of such nuances,
which earn him trust and occasionally, money.
Adarsh is fully immersed in the role throughout the length of the film. His exchange of energy towards the other characters of the story paves a solid path for Balram’s character arc.
Balram's state of poverty or riches is felt real by the viewers, and that
shows Adarsh’s commitment towards the
role. I believe that in his heart of heart, Aravind Adiga - the author of the
novel, The White Tiger, would have felt the bliss of seeing an actor give
justice to his dynamic character. This was a National Award winning acting.
The roles of the married couple - Rajkummar
Rao (as Ashok) and Priyanka Chopra (as Pinky) were tricky. I say this
because, they weren't just supporting roles. They had to be affectionate with
Balram, be his mentors in a way, and push his boundaries, meanwhile, not share
the amount of screentime as the lead character. Despite this limitation, both
the actors make the most of the time they get on screen.
They form such strong
pillars in Balram's character journey, that I find these performances to be Rajkummar and Priyanka's career best. No, they do not go into all the elements of
drama which they have ventured in their other feature films portraying lead
roles, but here they bring all those past experiences into limited screentime
and enhance the rasa (sanskrit, for essence or taste) of the story. They do not
make the film about them, but about what they bring to Balram's story and
overall film in general. I regard this as dedication to acting, and not
establishing a 'star' presence.
Even the limited time roles of the chief upper class oppressors played by Mahesh Manjrekar and Vijay Maurya, were true to the core of
their description in the novel. As a viewer, you will find yourself hating
them. In my little experience, I can safely say that the performances of these
two actors are what theatre actors aim to be able to show to their audience.
Concise roles, powerful acting.
A scene I photographed during my evening walks in Almora. Resemblance with Balram's will to conquer life.
Direction: What could we expect from a director who is making a brilliantly written novel into a film? That he do not present the story as it is in the novel, but give it his own rendition as suitable with the audio-visual medium of cinema. Director Ramin Bahrani does exactly that. He presents the sequence of events surrounding Balram's village in quick montages. These could have been slowed down, but the bliss of reading those events in the Novel is far beyond any screen-time, and I assume the director was aware of that.
He instead gives more breathing space to the scenes leading to Balram's
learning of rich life and his breakthrough. For a director adapting a novel to
a film, the understanding of the difference and uniqueness between textual and audio-video medium is a must, and Ramin knows that.
There must be a reason(s) that Aravind Adiga dedicated the novel to this director,
and after watching the film, I can sense it.
Screenwriting & other elements: Direction
and acting lasted with a heavier presence than the screenwriting. Nonetheless,
the latter did have occasional intense punches, like that of the dialogues in
the novel.
An instance being, where Balram brushes his teeth hard with the aim
of cleansing his paan-masala induced
stained teeth along with the dirty smudge of poverty from his being. He spits out the
toothpaste and wonders, "if only a man could spit his past out so
easily."
Cinematography doesn't play around much with the vibgyor of lights; rather
keeps the angles and blocking focussed on Balram. For a servant after all, the
lights are accessories and not prominent than the struggle to live. After all, it
is the safe and comfortable who rejoice in intense artificial lights.
The frames added deeper visual meanings to Balram’s state of being. At times, too close to his face, making us see his ability to hide his pain behind a smile. At times, pinning him down as a tiny, worthless and lonely figure against the vast skyscrapers of those who cause him pain.
Production design accentuate the cinematography. The grandeur of the masters' royal beddings form a stark contrast with Balram's withered village home, where the travesty of daily earnings lets you forget the need of a mattress.
There was a minimal approach kept for the sound design. Only added
layers to specific scenes and gave a helping hand to the editing.
Final remarks: I think of this Film Companion interview of filmmaker Santosh Sivan, where upon
telling his photojournalist father about an interest in photography during his
childhood, his father would make him dust the photographs of Gandhi hung on the
walls. Then weeks later, he would ask the qualities and meanings in those photographs
worth remembering. The dusting was a guise, like a sly act of a Guru, meanwhile
examining whether the child is earnestly interested about the art.
Balram had a learning experience through his masters' lives. Though here, the
intention of the masters wasn't like that of the Guru. In this world, Balram had to
uncover the guise himself and seek out the teachings.
Watching this movie, brought the memories of the time I used to listen to this
song called 'Break On Through (to the other side)' by The Doors. Those were the days of fanboying the
collective works of the band. I wish
there was, at least a trailer using this song as the backdrop music.
Special Note: A couple of years ago, on a grey rainy day, I got an urge to write a poem on servant, which I had later published. Adding the original poem here, since it seems to compliment the movie well.
Servant
by Aashwin Joshi
Children of men burn
with a fire of safety,
I blaze with servitude;
Poverty, my gasoline.
Masters hail me a worker
But mirror cracks my image
to a broken being called servant.
I wear their money
like charitable apparel,
Under the nocturnal roof of riches.
Pre sleep meditation
tickles a homely bone when
rain drops do not kiss my cheek,
Under the concrete roof of city.
I feel not homely
at my master's home,
Home is an evaporated hope,
City men spit at my village.
Soft hands have toughened
and softer hands turned softest
I became a man unlike my master's son.
Idle since my arrival
That idol can depart his son,
If I bathe him in blood
will I escape with a godly fate like Him?
Hands join to work or pray
Father deemed life as such,
My son hugs his shadow alone in a room.
Love how you described everything. Definitely going to watch this๐
ReplyDeleteThank you, Rupal ๐ and yes, do watch the film!
DeleteGreat analysis!
ReplyDeleteThanks!
DeleteLoved the review.. But more importantly loved the poem!!
ReplyDelete